As you know, there are long lines on the ground to receive social housing. In queues for improving their living conditions, for the most part, the low -income sectors are in the most part, which are not able to independently purchase housing. Of course, due to poverty. This category of citizens has the only hope for social housing. By the way, social housing is built very slowly and people have to wait for it for years. There was information that the state intends to generally abandon the mechanism for providing citizens with social housing. Perhaps you will be interested in the development of real estate. Apparently, it is still overhead. And what in return? The state suggests instead of social housing to provide the waiting list housing in rental houses. This is the so -called non -profit rent. In this connection, I would like to dwell on a couple of moments. Firstly, housing in profitable houses cannot be privatized. The cost of living will be, they say, two to three times cheaper than, for example, renting housing from private individuals. So it turns out that «everything new is well forgotten old». Of course, in pre-revolutionary Russia, profitable houses made it possible to somehow solve the housing problem, and living in them was not at all shameful. But whether our fellow citizens agree to live in profitable houses? In people, profitable houses are associated with the same dormitories, but everyone wants to have their own housing, and not live somewhere “on bird rights”. Secondly, what a sin to hide, while the population is coldly related to the revival of profitable houses in the country. Really, again the notorious Russian mentality? The first experiments did not take success and did not find a proper response among Russians. Exactly students live in built profitable houses, and even then temporarily, preferring to rent housing from private individuals. It is risky to build profitable houses, t. To. you can not recoup invested funds. Housing is built not for sale in the market, but for delivery. And this, believe me, two big differences. According to preliminary calculations, the payback of revenue houses can be 25-30 years. As you can see, too long. It is not known what will happen tomorrow, and wait for income in thirty years is just stupid. It is unlikely, what a sane investor will go to this!
